Blain’s Morning Porridge Nov, 24th 2025 – The end of the American Age – what will follow?
“Let me die in the uniform in which I fought my battles for freedom, may God forgive me for putting on another.”
The end of the exceptional American Century is happening faster than we think. America is dispensing with friends and allies, and American Tech leadership is no longer unquestioned. It spells rising instability and threats. Defence has never been more critical as Europe seeks to define its future.
Sometime in the next few years markets will be forced to make a fundamental reassessment of macro-market themes based what will follow the American age. History shows Empires rotate on a 2K cycle – every 100-120 years or – often accompanied by conflict. What comes next will literally change everything – and it will require market participants to be prepared and be nimble and swift. History shows all Empires rise, mature and are replaced by the next one – it’s inevitable economic evolution.
The American age has been exceptional. We’ve seen incredible technological advances, rising health and prosperity, enabled by an explosion of global trade – but now it’s in its end-phase. The world’s population has quadrupled from 2 billion in 1925 to 8 billion today, as advances in medicine, agriculture, and resources became readily available. The last 80-years have seen a relatively more peaceful and stable world avoiding mass conflict of the scale that previously decimated populations.
No small part of the American Century of success was due to the strength and support of its friends and allies. The West embraced American culture, and spent trillions on American weaponry. We backed American IT, enabling its Tech giants to become the most valuable firms on the planet. An isolated USA – as many US politicians wanted in the 1930s – would have achieved none of America’s remarkable post-war successes.
The global economy is now in a period of hegemonic change. As the next leading nation(s) emerges – it will be a time of heightened uncertainty. It comes at a time of increased tensions and instability in the West. Long-held alliances are breaking down. Democracy appears caught on the ropes. Populists say only they can fix it, while real politicians realise democratic states come with unaffordable costs.
China is already flexing its power. One hint may come from Japan: Sanae Takaichi – the new Japanese Premier – has kicked the hornets’ nest. By threatening to intervene if China were to assault Taiwan, she’s triggered a massive counterstrike on Japanese sea-food exports. Chinese tourists have been advised against visiting Japan. It’s weakened the yen, but the threat of China boycotting Japan goods could trigger a bigger slowdown. The Chinese will want to test just how far they can push the new girl in Japan…. China accounts for 20% of Japanese exports.
The macro-economic consequences of debt mountains, potential unemployment, trade wars, political discontent and income inequality, rising inflation, threatened supply chains, and political demagoguery, are magnified by our fears of an uncertain future – we just don’t know who and what comes next.
Periods of change breed invention and innovation, but can anyone really replace America? China has become the global manufacturing powerhouse, and now challenges in terms of tech innovation. India is the largest democracy with keen entrepreneurial ambitions. But it’s not all about tanks and guns. America’s success was because it had an attractive narrative: freedom, democracy, the individual, mom, pop and apple pie. Mickey Mouse and MickyDees (McDonalds) conquered more nations than Sherman tanks ever would have. Neither China or India have captured global consumers the way America did – and that’s one reason I suspect this period of hegemonic change could be particularly drawn-out and unsettling.
What will be critical to the global economy will be how peacefully the process of hegemonic change takes place. Wars are avoided by being prepared for them – deterrence works, which I why I’m spending most of this week as Special Advisor, fund raising for Spitfire Strategic Capital. (See Tomorrow Depends on Today)
The must-read book of 2025 has been Breakneck, Dan Wang’s excellent book on “China’s Quest to Engineer the Future”. He characterises the USA and China as essentially very similar, run by people seeking to get rich and powerful. But while China is run by Engineers who’ve driven its breakneck (and often careless) rush forward by breaking rules fast, in contrast the USA is now governed by a class of lawyers who slow the nation.
Why do Empires rotate? Not because of conquest, but from internal pressures. The rising tide of “innovational friction” seems to be true of all late-stage democracies. Process and procedure dominate activity and slow the pace of urgent decision making. While government is blamed for the stickiness of bureaucracy, corporates and global money arbitrage the opportunities such inefficiency spawns. The result is widening inequality and dissatisfaction, leading to populism and potentially worse. Such is the way empires decay. (The fall of the British Empire was slightly different – we made the mistake of teaching the locals to play cricket, and then they started beating us!)
Today the obvious challenge is between China and the USA. And one key battleground will be Europe.
In the current negotiations on Ukraine’s future, Europe has been dismissed in the American calculus. Ukraine should be Europe’s problem. The tired old continent is seen as mired in the past, weak and divided. That is incorrect – Europe is not divided. Its problem is it is not connected. 80 years of baby steps towards European unity are still trumped by national self-interest – for instance, the French are trying to keep the UK at arms-length in the race to rearm against the Russian threat.
Europe should matter. It has economic heft: it comprises 600 million relatively prosperous consumers with over $100 trillion in private wealth. (This excludes 145 million dirt-poor Russians worth just $4.5 trillion.)
There is no doubt South-East Asia will be the future economic focus of rising wealth and prosperity. Including China and India, it will continue to grow more rapidly, with a market of some 3.7 billion consumers and net worth around $100 trillion. The middle classes are spending at an increasing rate. It is the market to play for.
From the perspective of China or the USA, Europe should remain a trading partner of some significance. China has the choice to compete and trade with Europe, or would they prefer to dominate and keep Europe destabilised through it proxy, Russia? Trade feels more likely – but only if Europe shows its willingness to defend itself! Which is why the rearmament trade is a long-term play.
As the American age ends, America is surprising the globe. The governing party doesn’t want to fund or be involved in other people’s wars. America First policies including the threats to Canada, to acquire Greenland, and now a task force threatening the mighty Narco State of Venezuela, all hint at it’s the intention of being the big fish in the smaller pool of an American Hemisphere.
Europe still has choices.
How will Europe now perceive America following the treatment it is meting out to friends and allies? The shocking betrayal of Ukraine to the Russian aggressor does not look the considered or wise actions of a friend and ally. The 28 proposals on the President’s ultimatum look like The Ribbentrop – Molotov Pact that carved up Poland just days ahead of World War 2. It is a deal neither Europe nor Ukraine should accept.
It is America that has surrendered here. It has walked away from friends and allies, betraying democracy and freedom.
The consequence will be to force Europe to make tough choices, and adopt a very different approach to the new global economic reality. To be relevant within it – Europe will need to be open to trade and well armed. The future of AI and later quantum computing are already shifting China’s direction. Energy will be transformed by fusion – where Europe has a lead. There is trade – careful, cautious and protected – between China and Europe is there to be done.
For America, the outlook will be interesting – as global trade rebalances in Asia and with Europe, the role of the dollar in trade will continue to fall, meaning the dollar trade remittances global banks funded into the US treasury market will also decline. Who will buy US Treasury bonds in the future if global trade moves away?
Consequences, consequences… Mistakes are made swiftly. We regret them at leisure.
(Extra points will be awarded to anyone who gets the significance of this morning’s top line quote.)
Out of time, and back to the day job..
Bill Blain
CEO – Windshift Capital
Author – The Morning Porridge
Partner – Shard Capital
Special Advisor – Spitfire Strategic Capital
9 Comments
Comments are closed.


Benedict Arnold Bill, the American Traitor. known locally as Judas…but who could you be alluding too…and how many pieces of silver?
Or what Kompromat?
” Kompromat”
Perfect choice of word there Bill
Did you use the quote to serve as a cautionary point: loyalties and uniforms (metaphors for allegiance) matter. Changing sides (metaphorically or literally) may carry deep moral/regret implications.
Benedict Arnold served as a major general in the American Revolutionary War on the American (Continental) side, fighting for independence from Britain. Later, he defected to the British side and became widely notorious in American history as a synonym for “traitor.”
Indeed… Benedict Arnold.
America has changed sides, and like Arnold, methinks they will regret come to regret it.
From reader:
The Trump Ultimatium demands Ukraine surrender territory, shrink its military, and abandon NATO membership. It was straight out the Kremlin. Trump shows little awareness of the depth of distrust his actions create. Adult-in-the-room Marco Rubio is trying to clean up the mess. This leaves U.S. credibility damaged. It will increase suspicions Trump has been compromised by Vladimir Putin. Kompromat.
Really interesting and insightful analysis
Sometimes I’m wondering if you’re looking through the wrong end of the field glasses, Bill.
I can’t argue with the dodgy Russia-Ukraine “negotiations,” but that’s not over yet. Plus, let’s be real here, a significant part of why Putin moved on Ukraine is due to Obama and the EU (pronounced “ew”) essentially looking the other way when he took Crimea. Consequences, yes. And subsequent to that, what did the EU, or the British, or anyone in Yoorp actually do to ameliorate relations with Putin?
“Help us Mr. American!” Pathetic.
By the way, Trump did not cause wealth inequality in America or anywhere else. That’s been going on for longtime now, including under Obama (and administrations previous), and, I would argue, put on hyper-speed by the idiots who created and “solved” The Great Financial Crisis in 2008 (Thank you Mr. Bernanke, et al). As far as populism, that has also been in the works for longtime, and you can blame it muchly on the Democratic (and yes, to some degree Republican) Party essentially doing an LBJ job on the majority of Americans. Extra points if you know what I’m referring to there.
You say that “…democratic states come with unaffordable costs.” Honestly, this is one place you should amend it to “social democratic states.” Conservatives have been, and should be, supportive of strong but small federal governments. The Left everywhere wants the government to take on more and more until it engulfs the entire world in a Socialist Utopian Superstate. They want democratic nations to fail. There are things government should do, and only can do, but everything? I don’t want to turn that corner. Are you correct that turning over things to “corporates” can be problematic? Of course. But turning everything over to government is disastrous and totalitarian, and even more costly.
Which brings us to China, wait, where is it….hmmmm….oh, there, hang on, getting on my Hobby Horse here…
I wish the World the best in their fascination with China. Xi started 12 years ago with the Belt and Road Initiative. Why the Left thinks America to be imperialistic, while at the same time drooling over this amoebic slave-state is beyond belief. Or, rather, emblematic. As I’ve said before, if you don’t like Trump, why are you enthralled with Xi? He’s everything you think Trump wants to be, AND MORE!
India is important, so is Africa in my thinking. If they could get past their foibles, watch out! There is a better chance to capture imaginations there than with the Engineers. Keep an eye on that space.
America has bailed out the West time and time again, yes, to our benefit. How about this, Bill: Maybe it’s time for the West to come to the aide of America? I’m not talking about Trump, I’m talking about the institution, the meaning, the intent, of America: Individual Liberty and the Rule of Law. Have we fallen from glory? Sure. Are we striving among ourselves for a path forward? Yep. How about, though, we all return to the ideal, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”
It’s all a freaking mess, but I think there is path that free-market societies can take forward together, without bowing and scraping to totalitarians or petty dictators, or succumbing to utopian fantasies about some worker’s paradise.
Yes… there is a large element of “fooling ourselves” going on!