Blain’s Morning Porridge – March 16 2021: Vaccine Cold Wars
“How long could we allow this beast to gorge and guzzle, feed and feast..”
This morning – Why is Europe suspending the AstraZeneca Vaccine? What’s the real story? And; The trick to investing in disruptive tech is to spot the solution to a need, rather than an answer looking for a question.
We’ve an interesting day’s play here in prospect in global financial markets….
This morning the French, Germans and Italians have announced a coordinated suspension of the Oxford developed AstraZeneca vaccine. The effect will be to further diminish confidence in the AZ jab and the vaccination programme as a whole across Europe. It will have market implications. Without an effective vaccine programme in Europe – forget European holidays and the recovery play in names like TUI, Ryan Air and Sleazy Jet. They will all likely be back under the cosh.
European nations are progressively acting to delay the AstraZeneca vaccine, further delaying the already flawed rollout. You have to wonder what is going on. What is it the European Union leadership knows that medical experts around the globe don’t?
The Europeans say they are very concerned about the number of Thrombosis events around people given the Oxford developed jab. That number is around 40 events of either deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolisms in the 17 million people vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine. Not all of these events have been fatal.
There was a French doctor on the radio saying it was clearly dangerous for many patients and this needed to be investigated. The British vaccine expert gamely tried to explain the numbers showed that people given the AZ vaccine were actually suffering fractionally less thrombosis events than would be expected in a normal population. (That makes sense – a major cause of Covid deaths is thrombosis.. if you vaccinate, you reduce thrombosis deaths) He was at a loss to explain why his continental colleagues are stopping it.
The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), clearly said, in a statement, the reported thrombotic events relative to the millions of Covid 19 vaccinations does not suggest a direct link…. Clinical trials did not identify an increased risk of thrombosis.
The ISTH concludes: Based on all available data, the ISTH believes that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination strongly outweigh any potential complications even for patients with a history of blood clots or for those taking blood thinning medications. The WHO and even the European Medicines Agency both agree with ISTH.
All of which begs the question… why are the Europeans stalling the vaccine rollout?
Answers on a postcard please. Please post them on the website… and we can all chose which we like best.
In a totally unrelated event, the EU will be taking legal action against the UK for daring to extend the grace period for British supermarkets to put in place documentation and permissions for moving goods from one part of the UK to another. The UK set to announce its own plans for a pivot to the Pacific and East this afternoon. It all rather sounds like a monumental playground sulk…
Meanwhile… Disruptive Tech and Adoption
After too many years in financial markets I’ve realised its themes and narratives, rather than the actions of central bankers, or the ebb and flow of interest rates, that dominate the sentiment that drives markets.
I can talk all day about how the Fed distorting interest rates by a few basis points will have enormous consequences on the relative value of stocks versus bonds, or fuel a junk bond feeding frenzy, but all it takes is one clever analyst to proclaim a “disruptive” new concept. That can drive a massive rise in some new stock I’ve never heard of – and suddenly the market is off to the races. Often the disruptive new, new thing is something very old indeed, polished to look new.
For the past year I’ve been watching ARK Invest and its maven founder Cathy Wood hammer home its “disruptive innovation” message. It’s a strategy that caught the zeitgeist and worked right through the extraordinary period we’ve just seen in markets. Even as the pandemic bit and lockdowns put economies and jobs on ice, it attracted billions into its ETF funds, fuelled by the apparently unstoppable rise of disruptive tech. (Of course, it’s helped massively that Cathy’s funds hold all the hot names like Tesla and GreyScale.)
Two factors drove the Tech rally.
The first was cheap money. As central banks pump primed markets to avoid the damage a full-blooded meltdown would do to confidence in recovery, declining bond yields pushed money into better returning, but riskier, stocks. The effect was a massive swing in wealth inequality – the richest 100 billionaires have seen their wealth rise by over $1.9 trillion in the past year! It’s largely been fuelled but the value of their tech stocks. The rich just love QE Infinity and Govt Stimulus.
The second factor was the narrative around disruption and innovation. Think of something exciting – like flying cars. Sure enough; there are companies promising to disrupt conventional transport by soaring over our heads in autonomous drones. Feeling hungry? Don’t head to fridge, pick up your phone and use its’ sophisticated algorithm-ordered tech to order that Pizza the ad you just saw in social media made you think of. Worried about your savings? Don’t buy government bonds which will collapse in value because of the all the money they are borrowing destroying confidence in fiat money – buy this crypto instead because it’s better than gold or money.
Watching Tech is a bit like watching children let loose in a sweetie factory. You know they are going to puke. Or… Which one will be the Augustus Gloop and get sucked up the chocolate pipe? My money is one currently on Ark’s Wood or Softbank’s Son..
Over the past few years I’ve tried to debunk many of the disruption myths. I was right about We-Work, although it took ages for the market to agree its saccharine-sweet-high-tech flavour was just a stodgy property company. I’ve been warning about the dangers of over-estimating Tesla for years, most recently in this article about competition in the EV sector for Finance Monthly.
This morning I came across a new paper from the remarkable Rob Arnott, a chap I’m fortunate to know, on Big Market Delusion – in which he does an in-depth hatchet job on the EV sector. If you are a Tesla fanboy, don’t read it.. it will only hurt. If you are wondering what the real value of Tesla should be, then make sure you do. (If you want a swift summation of Rob Arnott’s note, then John Authers’ daily on BBerg covers it succinctly.)
I could write a very thick book about all the nonsense I’ve read about new tech in the last few years. All the stories about how tech is absolutely going to change our lives..
However, I come not to bury Tech but to praise it…
Tech does work…. When it’s adopted!
The trick is working out early.. what is likely to work, and what isn’t. The reason Apple is such a fundamentally strong company is because it designs, produces and sells an enormous number of very good products that dominate its chosen market. As a Applephile I am wearing the watch, typing onto a iMac, with an iPhone on the desk, an MacPro in my schoolbag, etc. That is not disruptive innovation – that is adoption.
We are now into a new phase in tech. We see adoption all around us. One fund I am invested in is Shard Capital’s Sure Valley Ventures – which funds software-based businesses. It’s seen enormous success as companies its incubated have innovated great ideas and got them adopted. It’s the adoption of the tech solutions these create that’s making the money. The trick is picking firms that answer real needs.. not those that imagine needs for something they’ve come up with.
The EV sector makes me giggle. So many brilliant new companies – almost more than there are potential buyers of EVs – all thinking they are the disruptive ones. Nope. They are competing in a very small space called cars.
Out of time, and back to the day job