Consequences – They are unavoidable

Consequences are unavoidable. Pension savers are crushed by interest rate repression and the changing demographics of Covid, while the deluge of debt fuelled by low rates does nothing for economic sustainability.

Blain’s Morning Porridge – March 11 2021:  Consequences

“We may choose our paths, but we can’t choose the consequences that come with them.”

This morning: Consequences are unavoidable. Pension savers are crushed by interest rate repression and the changing demographics of Covid, while the deluge of debt fuelled by low rates does nothing for economic sustainability.

One of the things any investor must understand is that everything has consequences. There are always consequences. They are unavoidable. 13 years of monetary experimentation by central banks has profound consequences. For everybody.

A few days ago my colleague, Mike Hollings, CIO of Shard, and I put together a vlog on shifting market conditions. I’ve known Mike for decades, and we both agree it’s the consequences of the last 13 years of monetary distortion (since the beginning of the Global Financial Crisis that began in 2007) that present the greatest long-term challenges for markets. (You should be able to see some highlights of our chat in the latest Shard Lite-Bite video later today.)

One of the issues we covered was the effect of repressed interest rates on savings – and how challenging these will be to the expectations of current pension plans. Sure enough, bang on time, there are two stories in the market this morning that throw our concerns into stark reality.

  1. The first is an apparent collapse in European birth rates. Far from the virus causing couples to spend their lockdown time engaged in amorous activities, it appears the pandemic has been an enormous discouragement to births. This could trigger profound demographic consequences – the most critical long-term factor acting on economic growth.
  2. The second is the increasing stress in Pension Schemes to match low yielding assets to rising liabilities. The longer interest rates are repressed, the less pension schemes are going to able to fund expectations, triggering all kinds of potential social consequences – what’s the point in saving when savings are worth nothing?

In this morning’s Thunderer, Simon Nixon writes about tumbling demographics as the pandemic baby boom fails to materialise. Data from Spain, France and Italy shows births were down 20.4%, 13.5% and 21% in December 2020 – the first month we’d expect to see pandemic births. Italian research suggests women have postponed planned pregnancies because of the virus. The result is 200,000 fewer Italians in a single year as deaths outpace births.

Declining has massive potential consequences if it plays forward: a 2% reduction in births globally will dwarf global Covid-19 deaths, and possibly bring estimated peak global population estimates forward from 2060 to 2050, meaning our kids are going to find fewer and fewer workers to support their retirement – the so-called dependency ratio. Fewer high-spending young adults changes the outlook for the high growth stocks backing our retirement assumptions. For instance, Apple are going to be selling less iPhones and few iTunes subscriptions, putting its current valuation metrics under pressure.

The situation in the UK could prove even more complex as up to 1.3 million migrant EU workers may permanently have left after Brexit – reversing the positive immigration metrics that have massaged the UK’s economic prospects for decades. It may mean the UK economy is less sustainable and resilient long-term. It’s not only the dependency ratio, but these lost workers will have the effect of pushing up the cost of labour demanded by the remaining labour force.

While highly trained NHS nurses are unlikely to switch jobs to pick up Turnips in Norfolk, it’s an issue the Government doesn’t seem to have considered when it made the economically sound, but politically stupid decision to cap NHS pay rises at 1%.

Meanwhile, the FT highlights the USS – the UK university pension scheme which services the defined benefits of 400,000 members. When it comes to the problems of the UK pension sector, you can pretty much guarantee the University Superannuation Scheme will always be top of the list. The last valuation of the USS by the UK Pensions Regulator shows a £18 bln funding shortfall. That will come as no surprise to any financial professional – when real gilt yields are negative, then generating the returns necessary to fund academics retirements are going to be significantly stressed.

The choices for the USS look bleak – necessitating much larger contributions from underpaid academics and cash-strapped universities. Already some of the wealthier institutions have exited. It doesn’t help that years ago the USS scheme was craftily utilised as a way of rewarding academics; by giving them early retirement on full benefits, and promoting staff at the end of their careers to ensure higher final salary pensions. The result is today’s working University staff have to contribute ever increasing amounts to pay their predecessor’s pensions – which sounds just like a variation on the classic Ponzi.

What’s happening in the troubled academic pension sector is happening on a much grander scale across the public sector where UK public sector pensions are set to consume an ever-growing slice of government revenues. The difficulties swirling around the USS are growing more difficult as the unions are determined to blame the valuation methodology rather than economic reality.

Solving the gathering pensions storm is going to prove an enormous political gordian knot – unsolvable in its current form, especially when no is prepared to acknowledge the causes.

The growing crisis for all pension savers is a direct consequence of interest rate repression. Since 2007 rates have been kept artificially low, and the consequences are coming home.

The most obvious consequence is that distorting interest rates distorts the price of every single asset class; from credit, equity, property and alternatives. Every asset prices off the risk-free rate – the most important being US Treasuries – but when these are artificially held low, then the price of every single other asset class on the planet is also distorted by relative pricing effects – exactly what has fuelled the stupendous inflation in financial asset prices since 2008.

Another consequence is mispriced risk – a fundamental misunderstanding of how artificial interest rates hide, magnify and distort risk assumptions. Ultra-low interest rates have enabled a deluge of new debt issued by corporates and government – which most people assume must be some kind of good thing.  Yet the consequences are massively increased fears about the unsustainability of burgeoning government debt in terms of monetary instability and declining confidence in fiat currencies, which has fuelled the ridiculous right-wing notion that independent cryptocurrencies are better than money – because they remove the distortions of government???

We’re seeing record issuance in the corporate bond markets being hoovered up by investors. Yesterday, American Airlines, which is losing $30mm per day just to keep the hanger doors open, was able to raise a $45 bln order book for a $10 bln debt deal, plus it’s pledged its customer loyalty programme to government in return for a further loan.

Record debt issuance in investment grade and junk credits are hopefully going towards recovery, but is more likely either keeping companies from insolvent collapse, or are being used for stock buyback programmes.

Until we fess up to the consequences – we won’t solve their effects.

Elsewhere… Why does Bloomberg hate me?

I would love to be able to incorporate news and comments from reading the many excellent financial journalists on Bloomberg. Unfortunately, Bloomberg has decided I am not a human. Although it helps itself to a massive subscription from my bank account each month, it has decided I am not entitled to log in any more.

There may be financial developments and scoops on Bloomberg, but sadly I won’t be sharing them anymore as I’m going to ask for my money back.

And finally…

Yesterday was the first day of the America’s Cup in New Zealand and the score is 1:1. The honours go to the Italian challengers – who have given the Kiwi holders much to think about. The Kiwis look to be a smidge faster downwind and the boats about even uphill. It’s shaping up to be great racing. It’s a best of 13 series – first boat to Seven wins the Auld Mug – the oldest trophy in International Sport. The Italian’s knock out the UK in the Prada Cup last month, a race series that determines who gets to challenge the America’s cup holder.

Five Things To Read This Morning

FT – Food and agritech companies race to tap public markets

FT – Greensill painted a rosy picture as it sought $1 bln before collapse

WSJ – Booming Electric Vehicle Demand Supercharges Lithium Prices

Thunderer – Global Bosses Backing Britain

Torygraph – The EU Elite will never take responsibility for its vaccine disaster

Out of time and back to the day job

Bill Blain

Shard Capital


  1. Bill

    you are so right on pensions !

    we face ( or our kids do ) paying in more, for less return and for a lower result

    and the public pension issue will become a huge economic issue for many countries as it busts government finances, just as sustained rising interest rates will do, but not a political one as none are brave or stupid enough to address it !

    hence we must save in all the tax efficient methods we can to help our kids – isas, pensions, property…

    just when you thot you could retire !

  2. the American Rescue Plan, 1.9 trillion bucks, has $85 billion dollars to rescue some private (who?) pension plans about to go bust. I guess we’ll see more of this.

  3. You are correct in your two worries however I don’t believe that worry #1 is solvable. If the financial system is reliant upon increasing population growth forever then we are doomed. Better to stop growing , fix the planet, and fix our economic system now. The only solution to pension problems (which we also have in the US) is to pay less on a nonlinear scale similar to our social security system. Lowest incomes receive 90-100% of their pensions while upper incomes receive around 35%. The reimbursement curve is actually three line segments with two break points and a maximum cap. I believe that the US will have to implement such a scheme for its public pensions (and any private pension systems which fail).

  4. The deflationary wage effects of Eastern Europeans entering the UK market has come to an end. How awful.
    In fact , finally, after 15-20 years of wage stagnation the very thing that allows consumers to power the UK’s 80% consumer economy (i.e., wages) is back on track in the right direction.

    Globalisation has not been good for wages in the western world. The system is at breaking point.

    An example of public sector pensions: It appears NHS workers had a generous pension prior to 1995 – and not too shabby until 2008. Up to 18% of final salary perhaps. But since 2015 not so good. Perhaps 1.8%? The Tories squashed these entitlements.
    Could you see the French taking such assertive action? Non.

Comments are closed.